Legal Opinion

Village of Mamaroneck v. Town of Rye

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 7, 2007PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring that the defendants third-party plaintiffs are responsible for repairing and maintaining the superstructure and substructure of the North Barry Avenue Extension Bridge, the defendants third-party plaintiffs Town of Rye, Village of Port Chester, and Village of Rye Brook, and the third-party defendant Town of Mamaroneck appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (LaCava, J.), entered December 22, 2005, which, after a nonjury trial, in effect, declared that the defendants third-party plaintiffs Town of Rye, Village of Port…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Northern Westchester Professional Park Associates v. Town of BedfordNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Huron Street Realty Corp. v. LorenzoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. Wright v. Cetek Technologies, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Oberman v. RomanowskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. Dailey v. New York State Thruway AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  3. Dailey v. New York State Thruway AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API