Christofersen v. Radovich

— The plaintiff brought this action to foreclose a labor and materialman’s lien on the home of the defendants. The defendants cross-complained. From a judgment in favor of the defendants on their cross-complaint, the plaintiff appeals.

Appellant’s contentions were that he had agreed to furnish the labor and did furnish the labor in the construction of a dwelling for the respondents for twelve hundred dollars; that later he agreed to furnish the labor and did furnish the labor in framing the garage for fifty dollars; that he had furnished materials to the value of $57.55 for which he had not…