Legal Opinion

United States v. Doragon Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 6, 1925No. 2372PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBabbeR, Judge

This case involves numerous protests made by different importers and covering a variety of articles.

No samples are before us, but a stipulation between counsel is of record showing in detail the material of which each article is made and the descriptive names of the articles themselves. Therefrom it appears that there were bone-bead necklaces with bone clasps, bone pendants with pierced holes, ivory pendants with pierced holes, ivory roses, ivory necklaces with ivory clasps, ivory pendants in the form of roses with pierced holes, ivory brooches in the form of flowers with small brass pins and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Nix v. HeddenSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Robertson v. SalomonSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  3. Sonn v. MagoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. American Bead Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
  5. Rosenberger v. GuthmanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. International Forwarding Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API