J. F. Turner & Bro. v. Gable
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtWillson, C. J.
(after stating the facts as above). If the value of the mules exceeded $200, the justice court did not have jurisdiction of the suit (article 5, § 19, of the Constitution); and, if it did not, the county court did not, by the appeal to it, acquire jurisdiction thereof. Cotulla v. Goggan, 77 Tex. 32, 13 S. W. 742; Schwartz v. Fries, 31 S. W. 214; Smith v. Carroll, 28 Tex. Civ. App. 330, 66 S. W. 863. But, in determining the questions as to jurisdiction, both the justice court and the county court were bound to assume the value of the mules to be as alleged in appellant’s pleadings, in the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cotulla v. Thomas Goggan & Bros.Texas Supreme Court · 1890
- Dwyer v. Bassett & BassettTexas Supreme Court · 1885
- Graham v. RoderTexas Supreme Court · 1849
- Smith v. CarrollCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1902
- Baker & Terrell v. GuinnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1893
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Brown v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
- Parks v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
- Stripling v. MooneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918