Legal Opinion

Smith v. Carroll

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 15, 1902PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error from the County Court of Dallas. Tried below before Hon. Kenneth Foree.

1Opinion of the Court

TEMPLETON, Associate Justice.

P. E. Rape sued C. F. Smith in the court of N. A. Carroll, a justice of the peace, on a debt of $170, and to foreclose a mortgage lien on two horses and a lease on 100 acres of land. The mortgaged property was then of the value of $300, and was of that value when the case was disposed of in the Justice Court. A trial resulted in a verdict and judgment for the defendant. On motion of the plaintiff a new trial was granted. The second trial resulted as did the first. The plaintiff made a verbal motion for another new trial, which was heard and granted without notice…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sumner v. CrawfordTexas Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Cotulla v. Thomas Goggan & Bros.Texas Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. WareTexas Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. M. Cohen v. Minor MooreTexas Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Stricklin v. Arrington CarterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
  3. Cantrell v. CawyerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  4. Lusk v. HardinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  5. City Nat. Bank v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API