Ex Parte Spann
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
Appellant was convicted in the justice court on a complaint charging him with having in his possession during the closed season one quail, which is described as a game bird. The punishment was assessed at a fine of ten dollars, and, failing to pay the fine, appellant was placed in the custody of the sheriff. Thereafter he made application to the county judge for a writ of habeas corpus, alleging that there was no statute prohibiting the possession of game birds during the closed season. The writ was issued and upon a hearing appellant was remanded to custody. Hence this appeal.
Article 923,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- American Indemnity Co. v. City of AustinTexas Supreme Court · 1922
- Pratt Institute v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
- State v. TowerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1904
- Falconer v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1871
- Jeffries v. Board of TrusteesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Grant v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974