Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Spann

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 22, 1932No. 14974PublishedCited by 1 opinion

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

Appellant was convicted in the justice court on a complaint charging him with having in his possession during the closed season one quail, which is described as a game bird. The punishment was assessed at a fine of ten dollars, and, failing to pay the fine, appellant was placed in the custody of the sheriff. Thereafter he made application to the county judge for a writ of habeas corpus, alleging that there was no statute prohibiting the possession of game birds during the closed season. The writ was issued and upon a hearing appellant was remanded to custody. Hence this appeal.

Article 923,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. American Indemnity Co. v. City of AustinTexas Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Pratt Institute v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
  3. State v. TowerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1904
  4. Falconer v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1871
  5. Jeffries v. Board of TrusteesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Grant v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API