Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Asten-Hill Manufacturing Co.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided May 21, 1986No. 85-1386PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

BECKER, Circuit Judge.

This is an asbestos personal injury action brought by four workers and their spouses *31against their former employer. The district court granted defendant’s motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted, Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), on the grounds that plaintiffs’ claims were barred by the Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation and Occupational Disease Acts. Plaintiffs’ appeal is grounded on the argument that their complaint stated a claim for relief under the “intentional tort” exception to the Workmen’s Compensation…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. J. Donald GOODWIN, Appellant, v. ELKINS & CO., Robert G. Hayden, Richard Sichenzio, and Gabriel F. Nagy, AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
  2. Neal v. Carey Canadian Mines, Ltd.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Robert Allen Brown and Lola v. Brown v. Caterpillar Tractor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
  4. Readinger v. GottschallSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  5. Evans v. Allentown Portland Cement Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Aloe Coal Company and Commercial Union Insurance Company v. Clark Equipment Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
  2. New Castle County v. Continental Cas. Co.(CNA)District Court, D. Delaware · 1989
  3. Shelly v. Johns-Manville Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
  4. Oritani Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1991
  5. Herzig v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API