Legal Opinion

Castaneda v. Henneford

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 1, 2008No. 08-55684Published

1Opinion of the Court

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT YANIRA CASTANEDA, as personal  representative of Estate of Francisco Castaneda; VANESSA CASTANEDA, as heir and beneficiary of the Estate, by and through her mother and Guardian Ad Litem Lucia Pelayo, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; GEORGE MOLINAR, in his individual capacity; CLAUDIA MAZUR, in her No. 08-55684 individual capacity; DANIEL D.C. No. HUNTING, M.D.; S. PASHA, in his/ her individual capacity; M.  2:07-cv-07241- DDP-JC SHERIDAN, in his/her individual capacity, OPINION Defendants, and CHRIS…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API