Legal Opinion
Tomlinson v. George
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided June 30, 2005No. 27,817PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SERNA, Justice.
{1} Plaintiff-Petitioner Patricia Tomlinson brought a medical malpractice action against Defendant-Respondent Dr. Jacob George. The district court granted George’s motion for summary judgment based on the ground that Tomlinson failed to file within the three-year statute of repose period. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court by unanimous opinion based on several cases from this Court, Tomlinson v. George, 2003-NMCA-004, ¶¶ 25, 27, 133 N.M. 69, 61 P.3d 195, and we granted Tomlinson’s petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals.
{2} We address…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Earle v. RatliffTexas Supreme Court · 1999
- Garcia on Behalf of Garcia v. La FargeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
- Cummings v. X-Ray Associates of New Mexico, P. C.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
- Roberts v. Southwest Community Health ServicesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
- Kern Ex Rel. Kern v. St. Joseph Hospital, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Roberts v. BarrerasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Blea v. FieldsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2005
- Windham v. Latco of Mississippi, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2008
- Christus St. Vincent Reg'l Med. Ctr. v. Duarte-AfarNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2011
- Verrastro v. Bayhospitalists, LLCSupreme Court of Delaware · 2019
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.