Legal Opinion

Perkins v. Dole

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 16, 1926No. Gen. No. 30,341PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gridley

Plaintiff, by this writ of error, seeks to reverse a judgment for costs entered against him and in favor of defendant, after a directed verdict, by said superior court on December 19, 1924, in an . action of assumpsit, based upon the Illinois “Securities Law” of 1919, and particularly upon section 37 thereof. [Callaghan’s 1920 St. ¶ 2675 (37).]

Prior to the passage of the amendatory act, in force July 1, 1921, amending certain sections of that law, including section 37, plaintiff, at the earnest solicitation of defendant and one J. H. Hanson, acting as agents of the Indian Petroleum Company…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Merlo v. Johnston City & Big Muddy Coal & Mining Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1913
  2. People v. LoveIllinois Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Woods v. SoucyIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Winslow v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Puntenney v. Wildeman & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cola v. TerzanoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
  2. Goelitz v. LathropAppellate Court of Illinois · 1936
  3. Taft v. Otte & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API