Legal Opinion

Roe No. 1 v. Children's Hospital Medical Center

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 1, 2014No. SJC 11533PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCordy, J.

This case requires us to decide whether a Massachusetts hospital employer owes a legally cognizable duty of care to future patients of a doctor who has left the hospital’s employ and resumed practicing medicine in the employ of a different hospital in another State. We conclude that such a duty is not cognizable in the circumstances presented here, where the hospital does not have the type of special relationship either with its former employee, or with any of his prospective patients, that would create such a duty. Consequently, we affirm the judgment entered in the • Superior Court…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Nader v. CitronMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  3. Iannacchino v. Ford Motor Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
  4. Mullins v. Pine Manor CollegeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  5. Jupin v. KaskMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Sliney v. PreviteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2015
  2. Williams v. Steward Health Care Sys., LLCMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2018
  3. Adams v. Congress Auto Insurance Agency, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2016
  4. Doe v. Boston Medical Center Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2015
  5. Doe v. MedeirosDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2016

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API