Legal Opinion

Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. Beckman

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 22, 2004No. 03-1101PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TERNUS, Justice.

The Iowa Supreme Court Grievance Commission has filed a report with this court recommending that we revoke the respondent’s license to practice law based on the Commission’s finding that the respondent has again committed multiple violations of the Iowa Code of Professional Responsibility for Lawyers. We agree with this recommendation.

The respondent, Mark S. Beckman, has received ample warning — in the form of prior discipline — that his conduct must conform to the ethical standards governing his chosen profession. Despite these warnings, he has failed to modify his behavior.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. KallsenSupreme Court of Iowa · 2003
  2. Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. LeonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
  3. Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. SullinsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2002
  4. Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. BeckmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
  5. Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. HillSupreme Court of Iowa · 1998

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. HoweSupreme Court of Iowa · 2005
  2. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. MarksSupreme Court of Iowa · 2009
  3. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. RickabaughSupreme Court of Iowa · 2007
  4. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. CurtisSupreme Court of Iowa · 2008
  5. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board, Vs. Thomas J. MccannSupreme Court of Iowa · 2006

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API