Legal Opinion · Dissent

City of Los Angeles v. Cole

California Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 1946No. L. A. 19575Published

1DissentCarter, J.

I dissent. I agree with what is said in the majority opinion relative to the abortive order granting a new trial and the estoppel invoked against the appellants relative thereto. I also agree that the exclusion of the testimony of appellants’ engineering witness was not prejudicial under the circumstances related in said opinion, but I do not agree with that portion of the majority opinion which approves the giving of instructions to the jury in an eminent domain proceeding to the effect that the price paid by the condemner for other similar property in connection with its contemplated…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. STANTON v. Embrey, AdministratorSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. United States v. MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940
  3. Spring Valley Water Works v. DrinkhouseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Cent. Pac. R.R. v. PearsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  5. L. R. Junction Ry. v. WoodruffSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1887

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API