Parker v. Richolson
Supreme Court of Kansas
EEror from, Elk District Court. The opinion, filed on May 9, 1891, contains a sufficient statement of the case.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Simpson, C.:
R. S. Parker commenced an action in replevin in the district court of Elk county against Richolson and H. and Winfield Baird, claiming that he had a special interest in and the right to the immediate possession of certain horses described in a chattel mortgage made by H. Baird to W. D. Parker on the 11th day of March, 1887, to secure a promissory note for $700 of that date, payable on or *284before the 18th of December, 1890, with 10 per cent, interest, payable annually, made by Baird and in favor of W. D. Parker, and assigned by W. D. Parker to R. S. Parker on the 9th day…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Bradbury v. WiseSupreme Court of Kansas · 1949
- Thompson v. W. C. Howard Motors Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1927
- Copper State Mining Co. v. KidderArizona Supreme Court · 1919