Hayes v. Dunn
Supreme Court of Alabama
Appeal from the City Court of Birmingham. Tried before the Hon. Chakhes A. Senn. The facts of the case are sufficiently stated in the opinion.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the City Court of Birmingham. Tried before the Hon. Chakhes A. Senn. The facts of the case are sufficiently stated in the opinion. Appellee, after said amendment was made striking out all parties defendant except one, and having consented to a continuance of the cause until the next term of the court, waived the right to move to discontinue said cause because of said amendment. — McOonnel v. Worns_, 102 Ala. 687. Appellee, after having made his motion for a discontinuance, failed to call said motion to the attention of the court within thirty days and said cause, having been…
1Opinion of the CourtHaralson, J.
The complaint filed on the 6th of February, 1804, shows the action to be on a ¡promissory note by defendants to plaintiff for $2,500. The style of the case in the caption of the complaint is, “Clarke naves, plaintiff, v. Thos. H. Dunn, Fred C. Dunn, Evans J. Dunn, and Lloyd O. Gold, as partners, doing business under the firm, name and style of Dunn Bros. & Co., and Dunn Brothers, and Dunn Brothers & Co., and Thos. T!. Dunn, Fred C. Dunn, Evans J. Dunn, partners doing business under the firm name and style [of] Dunn Brothers, defendants.” The style of the case as employed elsewhere in the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Reeves v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
- Torrey v. ForbesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
- Ex parte HallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1872
- Shorter v. UrquhartSupreme Court of Alabama · 1856
3Cited by10 opinions
- Stallings v. ClarkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- Plunkett v. DendySupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
- Crawford v. MillsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
- Southern Ry. Co. v. LeardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1905
- Austin v. City of AnnistonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.