Darnell Tinker v. Craig Hanks
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
POSNER, Circuit Judge.
A state prisoner who seeks federal ha-beas corpus relief must with immaterial exceptions institute his habeas corpus proceeding within a year of when his conviction became final. 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1)(A). But this period is tolled while “a properly filed application” for state posteonviction review is pending. § 2244(d)(2). When last this case was before us, we held that an application for permission to file a second state postcon-viction proceeding is not a “properly filed application” for state postconviction relief, and so the district court was correct to hold that…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Artuz v. BennettSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Darnell Tinker v. Craig HanksCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- State Ex Rel. Woodford v. Marion Superior CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
3Cited by34 opinions
- Tucker v. KingstonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Eric D. Johnson v. Gary R. McCaughtry WardenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- Raymond Powell v. Cecil DavisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- Martinez v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- Lynn Brooks v. Jonathan R. Walls, Warden, Menard Correctional CenterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.