Legal Opinion

Cumberland Capital Corp. v. Patty

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided August 22, 1977Published

1Opinion

OPINION ON PETITION TO REHEAR

Cumberland Capital1 has filed an elaborate petition to rehear taking exceptions to the holding of the Court and rearguing the issues. Additionally it invokes the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, as well as the “commerce clause” (article I, section 8, clause 3).

Petitioners, in their zeal, seemingly have overlooked that this matter came before us on interlocutory appeal. The jurisdiction of *538this Court was invoked under Sec. 27-305, T.C.A., upon the basis that it involved “a controlling question of law as to…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Chicot County Drainage District v. Baxter State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. Great Northern Railway Co. v. Sunburst Oil & Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API