Legal Opinion · Dissent

Villeneuve v. Town of Essex

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided March 18, 1998No. 97-093Published

1DissentAmestoy, C.J.

The majority has determined its view of what 19 VS.A. § 971 should mean, but neither the plain language nor the history of the statute supports the inferred construction. Accordingly, I dissent.

Since the late nineteenth century, Vermont has had in place a statute allowing three citizens or taxpayers to petition town officials for repair of a highway or bridge. In its earliest form, the statute allowed the petitioning citizens to file a written complaint with the county road commissioners “if such town neglects for thirty-six hours thereafter to commence work upon said highway or bridge, or…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Trombley v. Bellows Falls Union High School District No. 27Supreme Court of Vermont · 1993
  2. State v. O'NEILLSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996
  3. Town of Cambridge v. Town of UnderhillSupreme Court of Vermont · 1964
  4. Payea v. Howard BankSupreme Court of Vermont · 1995
  5. Valley Realty & Development, Inc. v. Town of HartfordSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API