Villeneuve v. Town of Essex
Supreme Court of Vermont
1DissentAmestoy, C.J.
The majority has determined its view of what 19 VS.A. § 971 should mean, but neither the plain language nor the history of the statute supports the inferred construction. Accordingly, I dissent.
Since the late nineteenth century, Vermont has had in place a statute allowing three citizens or taxpayers to petition town officials for repair of a highway or bridge. In its earliest form, the statute allowed the petitioning citizens to file a written complaint with the county road commissioners “if such town neglects for thirty-six hours thereafter to commence work upon said highway or bridge, or…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Trombley v. Bellows Falls Union High School District No. 27Supreme Court of Vermont · 1993
- State v. O'NEILLSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996
- Town of Cambridge v. Town of UnderhillSupreme Court of Vermont · 1964
- Payea v. Howard BankSupreme Court of Vermont · 1995
- Valley Realty & Development, Inc. v. Town of HartfordSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.