Legal Opinion

Payea v. Howard Bank

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided July 14, 1995No. 94-414PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDooley, J.

Plaintiff appeals the Chittenden Superior Court’s grant of defendants’ motion for summary judgment. Following a work-related injury, plaintiff sought damages and other relief after defendants refused to reinstate her in accordance with § 643b(b) of Vermont’s workers’ compensation statute (“Act”). 21 V.S.A. § 643b(b). On appeal, plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly concluded that an exception to the reinstatement obligation, as provided in § 643b(d)(2) of the Act, applied in plaintiff’s circumstances. We agree, and therefore, reverse.

In 1986, plaintiff was hired as a data processor…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Trombley v. Bellows Falls Union High School District No. 27Supreme Court of Vermont · 1993
  2. State v. KrethSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988
  3. State v. BeattieSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Tarrant v. Department of TaxesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
  2. State v. O'NEILLSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996
  3. King v. GorczykSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
  4. McMurphy v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
  5. In Re DunnettSupreme Court of Vermont · 2001

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API