Caso v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH-RIBNER, Judge.
Mario Caso appeals from an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) that reversed the decision of a Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) and directed Caso to submit to an interview with a School District of Philadelphia (Employer) vocational counselor pursuant to Employer’s petition to compel Caso to undergo a physical examination or an expert interview. Caso contends that the Board erroneously determined that a Workers’ Compensation Judge has the authority to approve a vocational counselor for purposes of Section 306(b)(2) of the Workers’ Compensation Act…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Russell v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Hoffman v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Pelter v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Nolan v. Department of Public WelfareCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Key v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
3Cited by15 opinions
- Wheeler v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Armour Pharmacy v. Bureau of WC Fee Review Hearing Office (Wegman's Food Markets, Inc.)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- Caso v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Motor Coils MFG/Wabtec v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Summit Trailer Sales v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.