Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Philadelphia Electric Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 28, 1977No. 183PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

ROBERTS, Justice.

The issue presented is whether, under the Public Utility Realty Tax Act (PURTA), 1 the dam, dikes, and canal of the Muddy Run Pump Storage Hydro-Electric Project (Muddy Run Project) constitute taxable utility realty or excluded machinery or equipment. The Commonwealth Court concluded that the dam, dikes, and canal, owned by Philadelphia Electric Company (Philadelphia Electric), were taxable utility realty under PURTA. In our view, the stipulation of the parties establishes that the dam, dikes, and canal are machinery and equipment as previously defined by…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Jones & Laughlin Tax Assessment CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  2. Voorhis v. FreemanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1841
  3. School Districts of Deer Lakes & Allegheny Valley v. KaneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Gulf Oil Corp. v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  5. United States Steel Corp. v. Board of Assessment & Revision of TaxesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Beck Electric Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Miller v. Commonwealth, State Employees' Retirement BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Winn v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Commonwealth v. Molycorp, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Springdale Township v. Allegheny County Board of Property AssessmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API