Legal Opinion

Bean v. Kmetic

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 1978No. 86270, SC 24726PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBryson, J.

This is a boundary dispute proceeding brought pursuant to ORS 105.705 to 105.725. The following diagram, not to scale, illustrates the area in controversy.

Plaintiffs contend the boundary line is that established by the Kucera survey. Defendants contend that the boundary line is established by the McIntosh survey. The property of the plaintiffs Bean lies to the south of the property of the defendants Kmetic. Each party owns a parcel of approximately 15 acres. The Bean property was formerly a part of a larger tract of land once called the Jewell tract, situated in Clackamas County, which in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Albert v. SalemOregon Supreme Court · 1901
  2. McDowell v. CarothersOregon Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Newton v. McKeelOregon Supreme Court · 1933

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dept. of Transportation v. DietrichCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API