Legal Opinion

Newton v. McKeel

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1933PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBailey, J.

The complaint alleges and the answer admits that the plaintiffs are the owners of the following described property:

“Beginning at the quarter corner between sections 20 and 29 and running thence west 1.50 chains, thence south 75 links to the southeast corner of the Issac Massey D. L. C. No. 39, thence westerly 6.08 chains to the northeast corner of the C. Johnson D. L. C. No. 41, thence west 39.70 chains to the northwest corner of said claim No. 41, thence south 12.43 chains, thence east 12.92 chains, thence south 17.87 chains, thence south 82 degrees 25 min. E. 34.00 chains to the quarter…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Caufield v. ClarkOregon Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Anderson v. RichardsOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Dunnigan v. WoodOregon Supreme Court · 1911
  4. King v. BrighamOregon Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Vandusen v. ShivelyOregon Supreme Court · 1892

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bean v. KmeticOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Jenkins v. JenkinsOregon Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Fulton v. KuckOregon Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Jensen v. WestenskowOregon Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API