Legal Opinion
United States v. DiVarco
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided June 6, 1972No. 72 CR 177PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
WILL, District Judge.
The government is prosecuting the defendants in this case pursuant to an indictment which charges each of them with having made “a false statement as to a material matter on their respective 1965 United States Individual Income Tax Return,” in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7206(1), in that each reported income from commissions paid them by Chemical Mortgage & Investment Corporation never having received any income from such a source, thereby falsely stating the source of their reported income. In addition, they are charged with conspiring with Irwin J. Davis…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Louis Weinstock v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
- Gaunt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1951
- William C. Siravo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1967
- United States v. Delbert NullCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1969
- United States v. John L. Lodwick Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Wright v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1985
- United States v. Norman C. Edwards, Jr., Robert H. Bolden, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Joseph Divarco and Joseph ArnoldCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1973
- United States v. Orville S. ClaveyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
- United States v. GoldmanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1977
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.