Legal Opinion

United States v. Joseph Divarco and Joseph Arnold

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided October 10, 1973No. 72-1804PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PELL, Circuit Judge.

The defendants Joseph DiVarco and Joseph Arnold were charged in separate counts of an indictment with willfully and knowingly making and subscribing to a false statement on their respective 1965 federal income tax returns, which returns were verified by written declarations that they were made under the penalties of perjury, in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7206(1). The two defendants were also indicted for conspiracy in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371 in that they conspired with Irwin Davis, an unindict-ed co-conspirator, in violation of 26 U. S.C. § 7206(1), to report a false…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Spies v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Morris W. Gordon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
  3. United States v. BishopSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. United States v. Beacon Brass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  5. Gomila v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1944

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. United States v. Robert E. CarmichaelCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1973
  2. United States v. John Hedman, Michael Jercich, Thomas Karnick and Henry Larsen, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
  3. Wright v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1985
  4. State v. NardiniSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  5. United States v. Irving E. Miller and Frederick T. HymanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API