Legal Opinion
In re: DAVIS NEW YORK VENTURE FUND FEE LITIGATION
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 2, 2019No. 1:14-cv-04318Unknown
1Opinion
FILED UNDER SEAL PENDING PARTY REVIEW f UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 4 5 6 Inre DAVIS NEW YORK VENTURE FUND No, 14 CV 4318-LTS-HBP 7 FEE LITIGATION 8 9 12 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER 13 14 Plaintiffs, who are shareholders of the Davis New York Venture Fund (the 15 “Fund”), bring suit on behalf of and for the benefit of the Fund under section 36(b) of the 16 Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “1940 Act”), 15 U.S.C. § 80a-35(b) (“Section 36(b)”), 17 against Davis Selected Advisers, L.P. (“Davis Advisers”), and Davis Selected Advisers-NY, Inc. (“Davis-NY,” and…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hicks v. BainesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- Laura Holtz v. Rockefeller & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Fletcher v. Atex, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.