Billy Overstreet v. TRW Commercial Steering Division
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Concurrence
WILLIAM C. KOCH, JR., J.,
concurring.
I concur with the Court’s conclusion that, in the context of litigation regarding a claim under the Workers’ Compensation Act, the employer and the employer’s lawyer are not entitled to have ex parte communications with the physician treating the employee. However, I base my conclusion on legal principles that differ from the “contract implied in law” theory relied upon by the Court.
There is little dispute today that the law imposes a duty on a physician not to disclose a patient’s confidential health information unless the patient expressly or impliedly…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Quinn v. PhippsSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
- Shadrick v. CokerTennessee Supreme Court · 1998
- Givens v. Mullikin Ex Rel. McElwaneyTennessee Supreme Court · 2002
- Alberts v. DevineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
- Humphers v. First Interstate BankOregon Supreme Court · 1985
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.