Shea v. Shea

No opinion. Mae-Crate, Acting P. J., Murphy and Ughetta, JJ., concur; Schmidt and Beldoek, JJ., dissent from that part of the judgment which grants custody to respondent and vote to grant a new trial with respect thereto, with the following memorandum: In our opinion, the evidence was insufficient upon which to make a finding that custody of this child of tender years should be given to the father. In custody proceedings, the paramount concern of the court is the infant’s best interests, moral, physical, social and pecuniary. With that basic thought uppermost in mind, it is not only the right…