Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Boulware v. Martens

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 1, 1931PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

We are of opinion that the relator is entitled to the custody of his children. The amendment of 1923 (chap. 235) to section 70 of the Domestic Relations Law is limited in so far as it relates to the custody of minor children to cases of differences arising between parents. The section has no application to the right of a surviving father to such custody. The law, frequently declared (People ex rel. Byrne v. Brugman, 3 App. Div. 155; People ex rel. Beaudoin v. Beaudoin, 126 id. 505; affd., 193 N. Y. 611; Matter of Thorne, 240 id. 444), is that a surviving parent’s right to the custody of his…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Beaudoin v. . BeaudoinNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
  2. People ex rel. Byrne v. BrugmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  3. In re the Probate of the Will of WaringNew York Surrogate's Court · 1905

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Portnoy v. StrasserNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
  2. Bachman v. MejiasNew York Court of Appeals · 1956
  3. Kienlen v. KienlenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  4. People ex rel. Hausler v. StegmeierAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
  5. In re the Estate of BoulwareNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API