Sisk v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MOON, J.
Arthur Nelson Sisk seeks reversal of his felony conviction of driving after having been declared an habitual offender. He contends that he was wrongfully tried in his absence after the trial judge ruled that he waived his right to be present at his felony trial by failing to appear. We agree that, under the circumstances of this case, Sisk should not have been deemed to have waived or forfeited his right to be present at trial.
Sisk was arrested on June 14, 1984, and charged with operating a motor vehicle after having been declared an habitual offender. He appeared in the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Quintana v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1982
- Head v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State v. HudsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
- Cruz v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1997
- State v. GARY F.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1993
- Zigta v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2002
- Hunter v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1991
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.