Legal Opinion

State v. Martin

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 16, 1990No. 896SC160PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge.

The facts in the case are as follows: On March 2, 1988, Officer Tim McKibben of the Murfreesboro Police Department stopped a vehicle for a routine traffic violation. As he (Officer McKibben) approached the car to ask for the driver’s license, empty vials were spotted between the driver and passenger seats. Officer McKibben had seen similar vials used in the sale of cocaine. Upon informing the defendant, the registered owner and passenger of the car, that he (Officer McKibben) had probable cause to search the entire car, no protest ensued.

A search of the trunk revealed a dark…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  5. State v. BullardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  2. United States v. Tamara Lenise MartinCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004
  3. State v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  4. State v. RawlinsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  5. State v. QuickCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API