Legal Opinion

Crawford v. Hall

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 2, 1988No. 87-460PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is a legal malpractice case. The trial court granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment. This appeal by Janice Crawford involves only one issue: Was the counter-affidavit of plaintiff's affiant, Lana Borsook, legally sufficient to create a genuine issue as to any material fact? We hold that it was not, for the reasons hereinafter discussed, and we affirm.

Theodore L. Hall is a lawyer, licensed to practice in the State of Alabama and with an office in Mobile. Hall represented the plaintiffs, Janice Crawford and Gourmet Caterers, Inc., in matters involving the application of real…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Hodges v. CarterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. United States v. M. E. DibbleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
  3. Ramp v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1972
  4. Osborn v. JohnsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  5. Oliver v. BrockSupreme Court of Alabama · 1976

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Ex Parte WesleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  2. Ford Motor Co. v. BurdeshawSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  3. Tillis Trucking Co., Inc. v. MosesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  4. Joyner v. B & P Pest Control, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2002
  5. Pettigrew v. Leroy F. Harris, M.D., P.C.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1993

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API