Legal Opinion

Amende-Schultz v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided April 3, 1962No. C.D. 2327PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wilson, Judge:

These cases involve the classification of certain merchandise described on the invoices as “Frozen Skinless, Boneless *143Cod Fillet Slabs.” The importation was assessed for duty at 2% cents per pound under paragraph 717 (b) of the Tariff Act of 1930 as “Fish, fresh or frozen * * * filleted, skinned, boned, sliced, or divided into portions, not specially provided for.” The importer challenges the correctness of the classification and duty assessment and contends that the involved merchandise is identical to the fish product under consideration in the case of The Lee Herrmann Co.,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lee Herrmann Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959
  2. Iceland Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
  3. Hudson Shipping Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
  4. Chong Kee Jan Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. C. J. Tower & Sons of Nia., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
  2. Canion v. StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API