Legal Opinion

Lee Herrmann Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided July 15, 1959No. C.D. 2101PublishedCited by 69 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wilson, Judge:

The merchandise at bar, described as “haddock blocks” and “cod blocks,” was classified for duty at the rate of 2% cents per pound under the provisions of paragraph 717(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930 for “Fish, fresh or frozen * * * filleted, skinned, boned, sliced, or divided into portions, not specially provided for.” It appears that the fish blocks in question were advisorily classified by the examiner as “fillets” (R. 75). Plaintiff claims the merchandise properly classifiable at the rate of 1 cent per pound under paragraph 720 (b) of the act, as modified by the General…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Iceland Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957

3Cited by69 opinions

  1. C. J. Tower & Sons of Nia., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
  2. Amende-Schultz v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
  3. A. N. Deringer, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
  4. A. N. Deringer, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
  5. Advance Brokers, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API