Legal Opinion

Rosales v. Rollag

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided September 27, 2024No. 2:22-cv-01581Unknown

1Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Brandee Rosales, No. CV-22-01581-PHX-DJH 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 Sarah Rollag, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 This case arises from a rear-end collision which Plaintiff Brandee Rosales (“Plaintiff 16 Rosales”) alleges caused the premature birth of her daughter, A.T. (“Plaintiff A.T.”), as 17 well as other injuries (collectively, “Plaintiffs”). (Doc. 5-1 at ¶¶ 13–16). Plaintiffs and 18 Defendant Sarah Rollag (“Defendant”) have each filed Motions for Summary Judgment. 19 (Docs. 29 & 30). These Motions are…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. T.W. Electrical Service, Inc. v. Pacific Electrical Contractors Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  5. Soremekun v. Thrifty Payless, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API