Legal Opinion
Mancina v. McDermott
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided March 9, 2022No. 2:21-cv-00549Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION MAUREEN MANCINA, et al., : Plaintiffs, Case No. 2:21-cv-549 v. Judge Sarah D. Morrison Magistrate Judge Elizabeth P. Deavers TERRY McDERMOTT, et al., : Defendants. OPINION & ORDER Plaintiffs Maureen Mancina, Carrie Bezek, Julie Rudolf, Charles Rudolph, and Mark McDermott filed an Amended Complaint on March 18, 2021. (ECF No. 4, Am. Compl.) Defendants Sarah McDermott and Terry McDermott have moved to dismiss the Amended Complaint for, among other things, lack of subject matter jurisdiction. (ECF No. 9). The Motion is fully…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Wilton v. Seven Falls Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Brillhart v. Excess Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Green v. MansourSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Grand Trunk Western Railroad Company, a Michigan and Indiana Corporation v. Consolidated Rail Corporation, a Pennsylvania CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.