Legal Opinion
Arnold v. Holmes
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 22, 2026No. Civil Action No. 2025-0390Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ROY ARNOLD JR., Plaintiff, v. No. 25-cv-00390 (DLF) TALLEY ROBERTA HOLMES, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Roy Arnold Jr., proceeding pro se, brings this action against individuals and law firms whom he alleges have conspired to execute a fraudulent foreclosure on his home. Before the Court are certain defendants’ motions to dismiss, see Dkt. 31; Dkt. 32, and Arnold’s motions for default judgment against two other defendants, see Dkt. 52; Dkt. 53. For the reasons that follow, the Court will dismiss Arnold’s federal claims…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.