Voice Technologies Group, Inc. v. Vmc Systems, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PAULINE NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.
VMC Systems, Inc. appeals the decision of the United States District Court for the Western District of New York 1 wherein the court ruled on summary judgment that the VoieeBridge II devices made by Voice Technologies Group do not infringe the claims of VMC’s United States Patent No. 5,222,124 (the ’124 patent). Because Voice Technologies has not established that it is entitled to judgment of noninfringement, we reverse the grant of summary judgment and remand for further proceedings.
THE INVENTION
The ’124 patent relates to a device that enables communication…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Multiform Desiccants, Inc., Plaintiff-Cross v. Medzam, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Hoechst Celanese Corporation v. Bp Chemicals Limited and Sterling Chemicals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Vivid Technologies, Inc. v. American Science & Engineering, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Ims Technology, Inc. v. Haas Automation, Inc. And Gene Francis Haas, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Kraft Foods, Inc. v. International Trading Company and Houston Processing Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Merck & Co., Inc. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals Usa, Inc., and Zenith Goldline Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Sandra Solomon v. Kimberly-Clark CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.