Legal Opinion

United States v. Varraso

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided March 8, 1983No. CM 441203PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

McKAY, Judge:

This case is before the Court for mandatory review pursuant to Article 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice, Section 866, Title 10, United States Code (1976) (hereinafter UCMJ). The appellant, Specialist Five Varraso, was tried for premeditated murder. Convicted of unpremeditated murder, she was sentenced to reduction to the grade of E-l, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, confinement for eight years and a dishonorable discharge. The convening authority approved the sentence. While the appellant asserts that numerous errors occurred at her trial, only the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. McOmberUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
  2. United States v. LowryUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
  3. State v. GloverSupreme Court of Missouri · 1932
  4. United States v. SchneiderUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  5. United States v. BellamyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. VarrasoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985
  2. United States v. ApplewhiteU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1985
  3. Jefferson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
  4. United States v. LewisU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API