Legal Opinion
Rotstein v. Reynolds & Co.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided May 30, 1973No. 72 C 2763PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
AUSTIN, District Judge.
In this case plaintiff seeks damages under state and federal securities laws from two broker-dealer defendants and two issurers of securities, Automated Marketing Systems, Inc. (“Automated”) and Monterey Life Systems, Inc. (“Monterey”). The broker-dealer defendants have filed a motion to dismiss certain portions of the complaint for failure to state a claim. To the extent and for the reasons indicated below, that motion to dismiss shall be granted and plaintiff is given leave to file an amended complaint in accordance with the provisions of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Parrent v. Midwest Rug Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
- Osborne v. MalloryDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1949
- Schaefer v. First National Bank of LincolnwoodDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1970
- Avern Trust v. ClarkeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969
- Bowman v. HartigDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1971
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Evelyn ZERMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. George BALL, Robert Fomon, and E.F. Hutton & Company, Inc., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Mauriber v. Shearson/American Express, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1983
- Newman v. RothschildDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- Norville v. Alton Bigtop Restaurant, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1974
- Marini v. AdamoDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.