Legal Opinion
Stanfield v. Chater
District Court, E.D. Missouri
Decided April 11, 1997No. 1:95 CV 103 DDNPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
970 F.Supp. 1440 (1997)
Larry B. STANFIELD, Plaintiff,
v.
Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.
No. 1:95 CV 103 DDN.
United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Southeastern Division.
April 11, 1997.
Eileen Kinney, Kinney Law Firm, P.A., Minneapolis, MN, for Plaintiff.
Eric Tolen, Office of U.S. Atty., St. Louis, MO, for Defendant.
MEMORANDUM
NOCE, United States Magistrate Judge.
This judicial action is before the court upon the cross-motions of the parties for summary judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. The parties have consented to the exercise of jurisdiction…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Lorraine POLASKI, Et Al., Appellees, v. Margaret M. HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
- Glenna R. WOOLF, Appellant, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
- Connie L. BAKER, Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Martin v. ApfelDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1997
- Maddox v. MassanariDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2001