State v. Deblasis, Unpublished Decision (6-3-2004)
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION
{¶ 1} Defendant Derold DeBlasis appeals from his conviction for gross sexual imposition. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.
{¶ 2} On October 10, 2001, defendant was indicted for six counts of gross sexual imposition in connection with alleged assaults upon three of his daughters. In Counts One and Two, defendant was charged with gross sexual imposition upon his then twelve-year-old daughter. Defendant plead not guilty to these and the four other charges which pertained to other children. The matter proceeded to a jury trial on February 19, 2002. The trial…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- State v. HeinishOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. LewisOhio Court of Appeals · 1982
- State v. MaddenOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. BumpOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
- State v. MoffittOhio Court of Appeals · 2016