Legal Opinion

Smith v. Bellefonte Trust Co.

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Centre County

Decided January 18, 1930Published

1Opinion of the Court

Fleming, P. J.,

— The matter before us is a rule upon the defendant to show cause why the statement of claim filed herein should not be withdrawn and an amended statement filed in lieu thereof. The defendant resists the rule and assigns as reasons therefor the following:

1. Because said amended statement sets forth a new cause of action.

2. Because more than six years have elapsed since a portion of the alleged original cause of action arose, and the amended statement cannot be allowed as to any alleged items in the original statement accruing prior to six years of the date of said amendment.

The…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Girardi v. Laquin Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
  2. Martin v. Pittsburg Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  3. Grier v. Northern Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
  4. Goldberg v. FriedrichSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  5. LaBar v. New York, Susquehanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API