Sivils v. Taylor
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from the District Court of Pottawatomie Countyj before Benj. F. Burwell, Trial Judge. STATEMENT OF FACTS. Action by John Taylor against James E. Silvis to recover on five promissory notes; jury trial; verdict for Taylor for $3,067; new trial denied, from which order denying a new trial, Sivils brings case here by petition in error for review.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the court by
Beauchamp, J.:
This action was commenced by Taylor against Sivils in the district court of Pottawatomie county to recover upon five promissory notes of four hundred dollars each, with interest at the rate of ten per cent per annum, bearing date August 30, 1894, the first being due January first,-'and one each year thereafter; each of the notes are for the same amount, and the same form and tenor, except the 'date of maturity, and reads as follows:
“400.00-100.
“BoKOShe, I. T., Aug. 30, 1892.
“On or before January 1st, 1895, after date I promise to pay to the order of John…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Watson v. BillingsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1881
3Cited by11 opinions
- Allen v. AllenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
- Walker Bond & Co. v. PurifierSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Likowski v. CatlettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Sims v. HedgesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Hill v. MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.