Legal Opinion

Williams v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided October 24, 1924No. 8087PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

— The offense is the unlawful sale of intoxicating liquor; punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of two and one-half years.

The indictment was like that held sufficient in Trevinio v. State, 93 Texas Crim. Rep., 439. Therefore, the motion to quash the indictment was properly overruled.

The fact that the alleged purchaser was employed by the sheriff to detect violations of the prohibition law did not characterize him as an accomplice witness. See Laughlin v. State, 260 S. W. Rep., 865; Smith v. State, 248 S. W. Rep., 685; Lamm v. State, 94 Texas…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Watson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917
  2. Toussaint v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
  3. Robinson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
  4. Trevinio v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
  5. Laughlin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hollis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925
  2. Pope v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API