Legal Opinion
TAYLOR v. OKLAHOMA WATER RESOURCES BOARD
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided November 5, 2015No. 112,145PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DEBORAH B. BARNES, Judge.
T1 The Sequoyah County Conservation District (SCCD) filed a condemnation action seeking a permanent easement on property owned, in part, by Plaintiff/ Appellee Jennifer Benitscheck Taylor (Taylor) so that it could perform rehabilitation work on a dam. Taylor then filed a petition before Defendant/Appellant Oklahoma Water Resources Board (the OWRB) asserting that SCCD's proposed construction activities are based on the assumption that the dam is a "high hazard" dam, and further asserting that the dam has never been so classified, and that it should not be so classified…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bivins v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- City of Tulsa v. State Ex Rel. Public Employees Relations BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
- Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Grand River Dam AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
- Fent v. Oklahoma Nat. Gas, a Div. of OneokSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
- Walker v. Group Health Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- BALES v. STATE ex rel. OKLA. REAL ESTATE APPRAISER BOARDCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2020
- TAYLOR v. OKLAHOMA WATER RESOURCES BOARDCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2015