Legal Opinion

Stolze v. Stolze

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 1920No. 15819PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from an order of the superior court for Pierce county, Card, J., entered March 2, 1920, denying a motion to vacate a judgment, after a hearing before the court.

1Per curiam

The respondent commenced suit against the appellant in Pierce county, Washington, to set aside a certain deed which had previously been made to the appellant, involving lots 1 to 8, inclusive, block 26, Cascade Park addition to the city of Tacoma, Washington, and to quiet the title to such property in *399the respondent. There was a judgment by default, wherein the- deed to appellant was cancelled and annulled and the title quieted in respondent. Thereafter the appellant, defendant below, commenced an independent action against the respondent here for the purpose of vacating and setting aside the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Boylan v. BockWashington Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Stolze v. StolzeWashington Supreme Court · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API