Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Marine

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 8, 2004No. 02-3317Published

1DissentSuhrheinrich, Circuit Judge

Because the facts of this case do not support a downward departure for family ties and responsibilities under the clear rule of the Guideline and this Circuit’s precedent, I DISSENT.

I

The Guideline clearly makes departure for “family ties and responsibilities” a discouraged factor. U.S.S.G. § 5H1.6. It is only appropriate in “exceptional cases” and if “present to an exceptional degree.” U.S.S.G. § 5K2.0(a)(4) and cmt. (3)(C). Given this explicit direction, this Circuit has consistently refused to grant a downward departure based on a parent’s obligation to a child because there is nothing…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee/ (99-1003) v. Jack William Tocco, (98-2312/2426)/ Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
  2. United States v. Marva Headley, A/K/A "Brenda"Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
  3. United States v. Lynda Gail Brewer and Teresa K. EvansCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  4. United States v. Theodore T. Rybicki, United States of America v. Theodore T. RybickiCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
  5. United States v. HaversatCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API