Legal Opinion

Department of Revenue of Ky. v. Lanham's Adm'rs

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided May 16, 1939PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Crbal, Commissioner

Affirming.

This cause was by agreement of parties submitted in chief upon pleadings and stipulation of facts, heard by Honorable Richard Priest Dietzman, as special judge, who in an opinion has so fully, yet tersely, set out the matters involved, the pertinent facts and his conclusions, in which we fully concur, that we appropriate and adopt that part of his opinion which reads:

“The sole question presented by this suit is the constitutionality of the following portion of Kentucky Statutes* 4281a-16, as applied to the situation presented by the facts in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Reinecke v. Northern Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. Helvering v. St. Louis Union Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Bingham v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Industrial Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. Martin v. StorrsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Trust Co. v. . Maxwell, Comr.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  2. Gearhart's Ex'r and Ex'x v. Howard, Etc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1946
  3. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co. v. MaxwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  4. Decoster v. Commissioner of TaxationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  5. Estate of Seitz v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API