Legal Opinion
Alvarez v. State Farm Lloyds
District Court, W.D. Texas
Decided March 2, 2020No. 5:18-cv-01191Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION JORGE A. ALVAREZ, § Plaintiff, § § SA-18-CV-01191-XR v. § § STATE FARM LLOYDS, § Defendant. § § ORDER On this day, the Court considered Defendant State Farm Lloyds’ (“State Farm”) Motion for Summary Judgment Regarding Extra-Contractual Claims (ECF No. 35), Plaintiff’s Response (ECF No. 36), and State Farm’s Reply (ECF No. 37).1 For the reasons stated herein, State Farm’s motion is GRANTED. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Jorge Alvarez brings this suit against State Farm, alleging breach of contract and…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Forsyth v. BarrCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.